05 September 2024 Keith Rix 260 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.