Is baldness a disease? Is baldness a disease?

Is baldness a disease?

Mr Simon Britten, immediate past chair of the British Orthopaedic Association Medico-legal Committee, in his foreword to the forthcoming Expert...
Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch) Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch)

Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch)

The judge determined that the proposed expert evidence, to support the existence of a money laundering scheme, was not admissible and, even if...
Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Unseemly conduct
Anonym 4274

Unseemly conduct

byAnonym

Last Thursday we made a statement following the collapse of the Carbon Credit Fraud trial. But another case hit the headlines earlier that week which highlights the imperative that an Expert Witness in whatever discipline they operate must be seen to be impartial and unbiased.

 

Professor Stephen Harris one of Britain’s leading authorities on foxes and a longstanding opponent of hunting, was excluded from the trial of Mick Wills, a huntsman with the Grafton after he was spotted kissing a prosecution witness.  Judge Daber in Wellingborough Magistrates Court said: -

 

“…If a relationship exists between a proposed Expert and the party calling that Expert which a reasonable observer might think is evidence of bias, then he must be excluded on the grounds of public policy.  Justice must be seen to be done.  The allegation of bias specific to this particular case is something in my view the Court cannot ignore.  A reasonable observer would consider him to be partisan however, unbiased he may be, this Court must exclude Professor Harris’s evidence”.

 

Professor Harris is a former Professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of Bristol and has been employed by the CPS previously to give evidence on behalf of the prosecution, despite earlier questions being raised over his independence.  In December 2015, a private prosecution brought by the Legal Against Cruel Sports collapsed after Professor Harris failed to inform the Court about his friendship with Paul Tilsley BLACS Head of Investigation and other connections to the group.

 

It is imperative that an Expert is not only unbiased and impartial, but is seen to be same and conducts himself accordingly.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.