Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Third Amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions
Sean Mosby 406

Third Amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions

bySean Mosby

The Lady Chief Justice has issued an amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions which comes into force on 22 July 2024. The matter was considered by the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee on 7 June 2024. The full amendment is available here and the text of the Criminal Practice Directions will be brought up to date with this amendment on 22 July 2024.

Expert Witnesses working under the Criminal Procedure Rules should be particularly aware of two changes:

(1) In paragraph 7.3.2(b) omit the words “and short reasons for”.
(2) In paragraph 7.3.5 for the first sentence substitute “A statement must be prepared by the experts dealing with paragraphs 7.3.2(a) – (d) above and giving reasons for the agreement or disagreement. Reasons should be succinct, especially on points about which experts agree.”

Experts should ensure that they comply with the new rules for any joint statements worked on, or submitted, from 22 July 2024.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.