Lost in translation Lost in translation

Lost in translation

In this patent case, the judge noted that neither expert was a native English speaker and both had difficulties with questions put to them during...
Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage? Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

A common issue in personal injury orthopaedic cases is whether the damage of which the claimant complains is degenerative or traumatic in origin or a...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
Expert Evidence by the Back Door Expert Evidence by the Back Door

Expert Evidence by the Back Door

The judge in this claim for professional negligence struck out a witness statement which contained paragraphs which were pure opinion, made by...
Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

The Expert Witness Institute (EWI) is thrilled to announce its inaugural Study Day, a comprehensive event designed to empower both aspiring and...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Recent judgment highlights Expert Witness failings
Simon Berney-Edwards 3448

Recent judgment highlights Expert Witness failings

bySimon Berney-Edwards

A recent judgment by The Honourable Mr Justice Fraser highlights the numerous failings of an Expert.

 

The recent judgment in Beattie Passive Norse Ltd & Anor v Canham Consulting Ltd [2021] EWHC 1116 (TCC) once again highlights the importance of those putting themselves forward as Expert Witnesses in developing a fundamental understanding of their role and the regulations governing their work.

 

The Honourable Justice Fraser highlights 8 key failings of the Expert’s performance:

 

  1. Embellishing and exagerrating criticisms
  2. Introducing new concepts or issues in the witness box.
  3. Under cross examination, relying on material that had no relevance to the issues under consideration in the trial. 
  4. Changing his agreement with, and reliance upon, the work of his associate whose work formed an Appendix of his report.
  5. A lack of objectivity.
  6. Constantly seeking to advance the claimants' case at the expense of expert objectivity.
  7. Introducing a concept into his cross-examination which was not an issue for the court.
  8. Taking a position on a contested issue of fact and did not change or alter his opinion in any respect after the evidence had been given.

 

In the follow up judgement related to costs issued on 25th May 2021 The Honourable Justice Fraser added further commentary on the well documented role of the Expert Witness.

 

He stated:

 

“There is a worrying trend generally which seems to be developing in terms of failures by experts generally in litigation complying with their duties. Practice Direction 35 makes the position very clear:
2.1 Expert evidence should be the independent product of the expert uninfluenced by the pressures of litigation.
2.2 Experts should assist the court by providing objective, unbiased opinions on matters within their expertise, and should not assume the role of an advocate.”

 

EWI Chief Executive Officer, Simon Berney-Edwards, said:


“This judgment provides yet another stark reminder of the importance of people putting themselves forward as an Expert Witness understanding their role and the duties to the court. Judges have an important role to play in highlighting poor practice and feedback such as this can ruin your reputation. Although the judge did not believe on this occasion that the actions of the Expert would justify an award of indemnity costs, it does highlight the implications for those Experts who do not take their duties seriously." 

 

The full judgment and supporting resources can be accessed via the links below.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.