10 June 2022 Priya Vaidya 713 Case Updates Re Q [2022] EWCOP 6 byPriya Vaidya The case: A 50-year-old woman with a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. She recognised that she had this condition and had struggled, unsuccessfully, to combat it for over a decade. Q also has a diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder, recurrent depression, a background of severe trauma and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Declarations were sought which, logically, required to be placed in the following order: a) a declaration as to whether Q lacked the capacity to litigate; b) a declaration as to whether Q had the capacity to take decisions relating to her treatment for hypokalaemia; c) a declaration as to whether an Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment (ADRT), made by Q on 14th October 2020, was valid or whether at the time of creating the document, Q lacked capacity. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags 09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles How not to use AI in expert evidence Litigation capacity Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) The Single Biggest Change White Paper Should anyone else be present at the consultation? Switch article White, R. (on the application of) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2022] EWHC 385 (Admin) Previous Article Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Bary [2022] EWHC 405 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.