Lost in translation Lost in translation

Lost in translation

In this patent case, the judge noted that neither expert was a native English speaker and both had difficulties with questions put to them during...
Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage? Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

A common issue in personal injury orthopaedic cases is whether the damage of which the claimant complains is degenerative or traumatic in origin or a...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
Expert Evidence by the Back Door Expert Evidence by the Back Door

Expert Evidence by the Back Door

The judge in this claim for professional negligence struck out a witness statement which contained paragraphs which were pure opinion, made by...
Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

The Expert Witness Institute (EWI) is thrilled to announce its inaugural Study Day, a comprehensive event designed to empower both aspiring and...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...
Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

In the 9th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at how to become an Expert Witnesss. If you think expert witness work might be for you,...
Working on a ‘no win – no fee’ basis Working on a ‘no win – no fee’ basis

Working on a ‘no win – no fee’ basis

Professor Keith Rix discusses whether experts can accept instructions on the basis of mirroring the solicitors’ ‘no win – no...
Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

The Ministry of Justice has published a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings. The call for...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Questions over use of ‘psychological experts’ in parental alienation cases
Simon Berney-Edwards 1897

Questions over use of ‘psychological experts’ in parental alienation cases

bySimon Berney-Edwards

A recent investigation by the Observer and reported by the Guardian is raising questions about the use of unregulated experts in the family courts being instructed to give an opinion on parental alienation cases.

 

In an interview with the Observer, Prof Mike Wang, chair of the Association of Clinical Psychologists UK board of directors, said:

 

“The organisation is aware of unregulated experts making findings of so-called parental alienation (PA) and doing tremendous harm. I’ve seen children taken away by the force of the state on the basis of PA. But what the public needs to know is that there is an international consensus that the evidence-base on parental alienation is not sufficiently robust to be making decisions about child-contact arrangements.”

 

Not all of those who call themselves “PA experts” or who are involved in parental alienation cases are unregulated.

 

But Professor Wang said:

 

“What I take issue with is a cohort of experts who I believe are making excessive claims about their qualifications while operating under vague or spurious titles which are not protected and could be misleading about the level or breadth of their experience.”

 

To register with the HCPC, psychologists must be qualified to hold one of nine designated titles protected by law, such as forensic psychologist or clinical psychologist.

 

“My view is the family courts should only appoint regulated experts,” said Professor Wang, who is campaigning for legislation to have the title psychologist protected.

 

Joint guidelines by the Family Justice Council and the British Psychological Society state the courts should “expect that all psychologists based in the UK providing evidence in the family proceedings are regulated by the HCPC and/or … have chartered membership with the BPS”.

 

Simon Berney-Edwards, EWI Chief Executive Officer, said: “We welcome the ACP-UK’s campaign. We speak to members of the public involved in Family Proceedings on a surprisingly regular basis who cannot understand why the expert does not appear to be a member of the HCPC or BPS. They are also confounded by the fact that experts do not have to be a member of the Expert Witness Institute. Members of the public should be able to expect that anyone giving evidence in a case that they are involved in has the right qualifications, is regulated by the appropriate body, and has received appropriate training in the duties of an expert witness. With directories such as our own Find an Expert Directory where experts need to demonstrate they possess all these, there should be no reason for instructing parties or the courts to risk appointing an expert without the necessary requirements.”

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.