04 October 2022 Priya Vaidya 2243 Case Updates Pickett v Balkind [2022] EWHC 2226 (TCC) byPriya Vaidya The case: A tree root subsidence claim in which the Claimant applied for an injunction against the Defendant to restrain the use of a letter from the Claimant’s expert in structural engineering, Mr Cutting, who was unable to attend the trial as he was undergoing eye surgery. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags 12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements Related articles When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB) Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Switch article EVANS v R&V ALLGEMEINE VERSICHERUNG AG [2022] EWHC 2436 (QB) Previous Article A day in the life of an Expert Witness at UK Planning Inquiries Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.