Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

We are pleased to welcome a new Corporate Partner
Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Successful Certification candidates receive their certificate from Lord Hodge.
Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Range of Opinion is the focus of the 5th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast. We catch up with Colin Holburn, Chair of the EWI Membership Committee,...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...
Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

New Template: Information for people attending an appointment with an Expert
Simon Berney-Edwards 3630

New Template: Information for people attending an appointment with an Expert

bySimon Berney-Edwards

EWI is grateful to member Andrew Quaile who has shared his template with Members so they can make use of it too.

 

To provide reports of a medico-legal nature it is often necessary for claimants to attend for an interview and examination. That is obviously different to reports for the court of a non-medical nature but on occasions clients may well need to be interviewed to establish the nature of the complaint and relevant facts to allow the expert to provide an opinion for the Court.

 

It is therefore important that the claimant understands what is to occur and the reason for the appointment. In my experience claimants differ hugely in how they have been briefed by their lawyers, if at all. They can vary from refusing to answer questions, if they are attending for a report written on behalf of the defendant, to turning up late and behaving inappropriately during the interview. Very few have their thoughts organised and many ‘forget’ previous episodes of symptoms which are relevant to the case.

 

Even more frequent are comments made after the report has been provided. These are often not relevant to the opinion and usually concern the previous records, which are matters of fact and cannot be altered. Many claimants speak too quickly or incoherently and are then disappointed if everything they have said is not in the report. This is made even more difficult during remote and video consultations. Claimants very rarely have taken on board the fact that the expert is independent for the court and in order to comply with that requirement the opinion should be the same if written for the claimant or the defendant. From a medical perspective, claimants are shocked that the aging process affects them and assume that an accident is responsible for all their symptoms and subsequent treatment.

 

It, therefore, occurs to me that claimants should be briefed by their lawyers beforehand. They should not be told what to say but told what to expect. I believe that would make life easier for all sides, both claimant and defendant. Some preparation by the claimant, including a written statement, would certainly assist the process but it should not turn into a simple cut and paste process. The claimant will need examining on their account of their claim, but any claimant submissions could be attached to the report.

 

To ‘prepare’ the claimant a number of actions could be taken including sending the claimant a document explaining the methodology and reasoning behind it. In a way this is a ‘consenting’ process. This could also have a tear off strip which the claimant signs and returns to the expert indicating understanding of what will take place and agreement to engage with it.

 

I have written a template along these lines for the Expert Witness Institute which will hopefully will cover most scenarios. I am aware that this is very much an example of something which could potentially be used by the medical profession but it may also be of use by experts in other disciplines with a bit of adaption.

 

Access the template

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.