Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Read more
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
Read more
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Read more
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
Read more
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...
Read more

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

CASE UPDATES
EXPERT MATTERS

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Negus v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWHC 643 (QB)
Wiebke Morgan 854
Case Updates

Negus v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWHC 643 (QB)

byWiebke Morgan

The case: a clinical negligence claim relating to aortic valve replacement surgery performed on 5 March 2014 by a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon. It involved the implantation of a 19 mm mechanical valve. 

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print

Tags

Legal testNegligenceOperative Surgery10. Report Writing

Related articles

Switch article

Gardiner v Tabet [2021] EWHC 563 (Ch), 2021 WL 00965862 Previous Article R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 Next Article
Comments are only visible to subscribers.