A fundamentally dishonest claimant A fundamentally dishonest claimant

A fundamentally dishonest claimant

This case concerns a fundamentally dishonest claimant. The judge held that the experts in the case were reliant on self-reporting by the claimant, who...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Modi v Government of India [2022] EWHC 2829 (Admin)
Priya Vaidya 620

Modi v Government of India [2022] EWHC 2829 (Admin)

byPriya Vaidya

“Anything new on the capacity to resist the impulse to commit suicide?”

 

The case: The appellant is sought by the Government of India for three sets of criminal proceedings. One of the grounds for appeal was that the lower court was wrong to decide that it would not be unjust or oppressive within the meaning of section 91 of the Extradition Act 2003 ("the 2003 Act") to extradite him by virtue of his physical or mental condition.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.