23 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 1130 Case Updates Kwikbolt Limited v Airbus Operations Limited [2021] EWHC 732 (IPEC) byWiebke Morgan The case: A patent case Judgment as to the conduct of the expert witnesses: Mr Vanhegan's submissions on Mr X as a witness mirrored those of Mr Ward on Mr Y: he was a good witness in cross-examination doing his best to help the court, but his report was not satisfactory. Each legal team was, by implication, accusing the other of having an overbearing influence on its expert. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert's behaviour10. Report Writing07. Working with Instructing Parties Related articles Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness EWI Refreshes Core Training offering Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives An unsafe conviction with flawed DNA evidence Switch article R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 Previous Article Towuaghantse v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 681 (Admin) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.