Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic... Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...
Justice for people with a hearing impairment Justice for people with a hearing impairment

Justice for people with a hearing impairment

A psychiatrist whose evidence had often been admitted in capacity cases was assisted in this case of a hearing-impaired person by an interpreter who...
Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

The Family Procedure Rule Committee has approved a proposal to roll-out the family court reporting pilot nationally, through changes to the Family...
Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence

Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence

This is an important judgment for experts who prepare personal injury reports in the Republic of Ireland but also for all experts, in all of the...
Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor... Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor...

Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor...

The Appellant was given permission to change neurology experts after the judge found that the application was not so late as to be prejudicial to the...
New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

The new Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal came into force on 1 November 2024. The Practice Direction...
Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

In the last podcast for 2024, we look back at the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over the course of 2024, and highlight the...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic Accident Claims
Sean Mosby 7

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims

bySean Mosby

 

Government response to 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims' consultation

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims’. The consultation sought comments from interested stakeholders on several issues of relevance to those who commission and/or provide medical reports used in support of RTA-related personal injury claims valued up to £5,000. The EWI responded to the consultation. 

The report setting out the government response summarises the responses received, along with information on the decisions taken and the next steps in relation to implementing outcomes related to the policy proposals consulted upon.

The Government has decided to move forward with the following changes:

Part 1: Changes to MedCo Qualifying Criteria

The Minsitry of Justice ('MoJ') will work with MedCo to update the qualifying criteria for Medical Reporting Organisations ('MROs'), including reducing the required report capacity for tier 1 MROs from 40,000 to 28,000 per year, and reducing the number of active experts from 225 to 175. MoJ will retain the requirement for tier 1 MROs to have active experts in 80% of regions in England & Wales.

Part 2: Amended DME Rules

MoJ will work with MedCo to implement the proposed changes to the Direct Medical Expert ('DME') rules and will slightly modify the wording around the role of the audit committee.

Part 3: Review of MedCo ‘Offer’

MoJ will work with MedCo to change the ‘offer’ for represented claimants. They will be offered two tier 1 MROs, six tier 2 MROs and seven DMEs. Unrepresented claimants will continue to be offered two tier 1 MROs, two tier 2 MROs and five DMEs.

Part 4: Use of Administration Agencies by Direct Medical Experts

MoJ will work with MedCo to develop a range of Qualifying Criteria which fairly encompass the support activities of different types of Administration Agencies before changes are made to the necessary secondary legislation.

Part 5: Review of Fixed Cost Medical Report

MoJ will increase the fixed cost medical report levels as outlined in the report and will consult on the required rule changes and new figures before implementation.

Part 6: Official Injury Claim: Medical report process

MoJ will work with MedCo to review and refine the MedCo Accreditation process and training, in line with stakeholder feedback. This is aimed at improving compliance with Parts 7.8 of the RTA PAP and 7.9 of the Small Claims PAP and improving the quality of MedCo medical reports generally.

MoJ will amend the RTA Small Claims PAP and accompanying Practice Direction 27B to ensure represented claimants using the OIC system must receive the defendant’s response on liability before instructing a medical expert. This is to ensure the instructions to the medical expert are complete and improve the quality of medical reports. MoJ will also work with stakeholders to explore the development of options for aligning the processes for obtaining medical reports, so that represented and unrepresented claimants follow the same medical reporting journey.

Government Engagement on Further Revisions to Fixed Cost Medical Reports

As noted above in Part 5, Government is engaging with stakeholders on further revisions to the fixed cost medical reports. After considering the responses on this issue, the Government decided to increase the FCMR using SPPI as the inflationary measure. They are seeking additional input from stakeholders regarding a further revision of the FCMRs to account for the delay between the closure of the consultation and the government response. The proposed revised figures are set out in Table 3 of the stakeholder engagement document which is attached below. The Government is seeking a response to two survey questions by 31 January 2025. 

Survey Questions

The Government previously consulted on revisions to the FCMR regime included at Part 45.19 of the CPR and agreed to increase them using the SPPI inflationary measure. However, to account for delays in publishing the outcomes of this consultation, a further revision to the previously proposed figures is now proposed.

1. Please provide any views on this proposal to set FCMRs at the newly revised values (a 25.4% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 3) as opposed to the values previously proposed in the 2023 consultation (a 18.3% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 2). Please provide an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

2. If you disagree with the proposal included in this document, please provide details of any alternative proposal you may have along with an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

The EWI will be responding to the stakeholder engagement. If you would like to provide input into the EWI's response please contact us at policy@ewi.org.uk by 24 January 2025. 

Documents to download

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.