Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their...
Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings

Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings

The parties sought permission to rely on expert evidence from three experts in respect of the claimant’s tazkira, an official identity document...
Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost... Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost...

Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost...

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee (‘Committee) decided, provisionally, to postpone the extended Fixed Recoverable Cost (‘FRC’)...
Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police  [2025] EWHC 272 (KB) Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2025] EWHC 272 (KB)

Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2025] EWHC 272 (KB)

The judge determined that the evidence of the defendant’s expert on the mental health of a man detained by the police was to be preferred in...
Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in... Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

In recent years a range of stakeholders have raised concerns regarding unregulated experts providing evidence in family law court cases and the...
EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

While there are many respectable and legitimate expert witness agencies who provide brilliant support to the expert witnesses who work with them,...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...
Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

In the 9th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at how to become an Expert Witnesss. If you think expert witness work might be for you,...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic Accident Claims
Sean Mosby 531

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims

bySean Mosby

 

Government response to 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims' consultation

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims’. The consultation sought comments from interested stakeholders on several issues of relevance to those who commission and/or provide medical reports used in support of RTA-related personal injury claims valued up to £5,000. The EWI responded to the consultation. 

The report setting out the government response summarises the responses received, along with information on the decisions taken and the next steps in relation to implementing outcomes related to the policy proposals consulted upon.

The Government has decided to move forward with the following changes:

Part 1: Changes to MedCo Qualifying Criteria

The Minsitry of Justice ('MoJ') will work with MedCo to update the qualifying criteria for Medical Reporting Organisations ('MROs'), including reducing the required report capacity for tier 1 MROs from 40,000 to 28,000 per year, and reducing the number of active experts from 225 to 175. MoJ will retain the requirement for tier 1 MROs to have active experts in 80% of regions in England & Wales.

Part 2: Amended DME Rules

MoJ will work with MedCo to implement the proposed changes to the Direct Medical Expert ('DME') rules and will slightly modify the wording around the role of the audit committee.

Part 3: Review of MedCo ‘Offer’

MoJ will work with MedCo to change the ‘offer’ for represented claimants. They will be offered two tier 1 MROs, six tier 2 MROs and seven DMEs. Unrepresented claimants will continue to be offered two tier 1 MROs, two tier 2 MROs and five DMEs.

Part 4: Use of Administration Agencies by Direct Medical Experts

MoJ will work with MedCo to develop a range of Qualifying Criteria which fairly encompass the support activities of different types of Administration Agencies before changes are made to the necessary secondary legislation.

Part 5: Review of Fixed Cost Medical Report

MoJ will increase the fixed cost medical report levels as outlined in the report and will consult on the required rule changes and new figures before implementation.

Part 6: Official Injury Claim: Medical report process

MoJ will work with MedCo to review and refine the MedCo Accreditation process and training, in line with stakeholder feedback. This is aimed at improving compliance with Parts 7.8 of the RTA PAP and 7.9 of the Small Claims PAP and improving the quality of MedCo medical reports generally.

MoJ will amend the RTA Small Claims PAP and accompanying Practice Direction 27B to ensure represented claimants using the OIC system must receive the defendant’s response on liability before instructing a medical expert. This is to ensure the instructions to the medical expert are complete and improve the quality of medical reports. MoJ will also work with stakeholders to explore the development of options for aligning the processes for obtaining medical reports, so that represented and unrepresented claimants follow the same medical reporting journey.

Government Engagement on Further Revisions to Fixed Cost Medical Reports

As noted above in Part 5, Government is engaging with stakeholders on further revisions to the fixed cost medical reports. After considering the responses on this issue, the Government decided to increase the FCMR using SPPI as the inflationary measure. They are seeking additional input from stakeholders regarding a further revision of the FCMRs to account for the delay between the closure of the consultation and the government response. The proposed revised figures are set out in Table 3 of the stakeholder engagement document which is attached below. The Government is seeking a response to two survey questions by 31 January 2025. 

Survey Questions

The Government previously consulted on revisions to the FCMR regime included at Part 45.19 of the CPR and agreed to increase them using the SPPI inflationary measure. However, to account for delays in publishing the outcomes of this consultation, a further revision to the previously proposed figures is now proposed.

1. Please provide any views on this proposal to set FCMRs at the newly revised values (a 25.4% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 3) as opposed to the values previously proposed in the 2023 consultation (a 18.3% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 2). Please provide an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

2. If you disagree with the proposal included in this document, please provide details of any alternative proposal you may have along with an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

The EWI will be responding to the stakeholder engagement. If you would like to provide input into the EWI's response please contact us at policy@ewi.org.uk by 24 January 2025. 

Documents to download

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.