Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in... Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

In recent years a range of stakeholders have raised concerns regarding unregulated experts providing evidence in family law court cases and the...
EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

While there are many respectable and legitimate expert witness agencies who provide brilliant support to the expert witnesses who work with them,...
Lost in translation Lost in translation

Lost in translation

In this patent case, the judge noted that neither expert was a native English speaker and both had difficulties with questions put to them during...
Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage? Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage?

A common issue in personal injury orthopaedic cases is whether the damage of which the claimant complains is degenerative or traumatic in origin or a...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
Expert Evidence by the Back Door Expert Evidence by the Back Door

Expert Evidence by the Back Door

The judge in this claim for professional negligence struck out a witness statement which contained paragraphs which were pure opinion, made by...
Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London

The Expert Witness Institute (EWI) is thrilled to announce its inaugural Study Day, a comprehensive event designed to empower both aspiring and...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...
Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

In the 9th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at how to become an Expert Witnesss. If you think expert witness work might be for you,...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in family law children proceedings
Sean Mosby 3

Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in family law children proceedings

bySean Mosby

 

Background

In recent years a range of stakeholders have raised concerns regarding unregulated experts providing evidence in family law court cases and the standard of the evidence they provide. These experts often use the title of psychologist and may be instructed to give evidence or offer diagnoses which they are not qualified to undertake. In the case of Re C, the President of the Family Division highlighted the “need for due rigour” in the process of expert instruction and that regulation of the title psychologist was a “matter for parliament”. You can read our case update on Re C here.

Officials have decided that the most appropriate route to pursue these changes was via the Family Procedure Rules ('FPR').

Consultation on new FPR 25.5A

Condsequently, the Family Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on new FPR 25.5A concerning the instruction of unregulated experts. The consultation also includes amendments to FPR 25.2 and Practice Directions ('PDs') 25B and 25C.  The aim of new FPR 25.5A is to require any expert instructed in family law children proceedings to be regulated. A key purpose of the changes is to ensure that any expert instructed in family law children proceedings has the appropriate skills and qualifications on which to base their expert evidence. 

The proposed definition of 'regulated expert'

The proposed definition of a regulated expert is set out in the amendments to FPR 25.2 as:

  • ‘regulated expert’ means an expert who is:

(a) regulated by a UK statutory body; or

(b) on a register accredited by the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care; or

(c) regulated by an approved regulator under the Legal Services Act 2007.

This requirement would not apply to international social workers and the court would be able to give permission to any expert where there is no regulated expert available.

Consultation responses

The Committee has set out three consultation questions:

1. Are there any experts not accounted for in the current draft of the amendments who you feel should be considered? If yes, why do you think they should be considered?

2. Do you have any feedback on Rule 25.5A and the amendments to PD’s relating to the standards of experts, as currently drafted?

3. Are there any other comments you would wish to make regarding the instruction of unregulated experts?

The consultation is available here with responses due by 6 June 2025 at FPRCSecretariat@Justice.gov.uk. The EWI will be making a response to the Committee and would welcome the input of members at policy@ewi.org.uk. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.