Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

The Ministry of Justice has published a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings. The call for...
Consent – post-Montgomery Consent – post-Montgomery

Consent – post-Montgomery

Although this is a dental/maxillofacial negligence case, it is of importance for all healthcare experts instructed in cases where consent may be an...
A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward... A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward...

A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward...

For surveyor experts, this case illustrates some very basic errors and it may therefore also be a useful case for expert surveyor witness training....
Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355 Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355

Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355

The Claimant alleged that the Defendant acted negligently in obtaining her consent for laser eye surgery including failing to adequately investigate...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic... Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...
Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

The Family Procedure Rule Committee has approved a proposal to roll-out the family court reporting pilot nationally, through changes to the Family...
Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

In the last podcast for 2024, we look back at the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over the course of 2024, and highlight the...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry
Sean Mosby 5158

Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

bySean Mosby

The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is currently holding the public hearings for its phases 5 and 6. The expert evidence relied on by the Post Office will be under scrutiny as the Inquiry hears from Gareth Jenkins, former Distinguished Engineer at Fujitsu Services Ltd, from 25 to 28 June. The expert evidence provided by Mr Jenkins has already been subject to criticism. 

We are proud that two members of EWI provided excellent, independent expert evidence or expert advice on the Horizon case. Their roles in the case demonstrate how important it is for Expert Witnesses to understand and apply the core competencies of the profession. 

EWI Honorary Fellow and former Treasurer, Kay Linnell, is providing evidence to the Inquiry on 20 June. Kay reflected on her involvement in the Horizon case, initially as an expert and later as a member of the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance steering group, in an insightful interview with EWI. While EWI member Jason Coyne talked to us about his fascinating involvement in a Spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal, where he was instructed as an Expert Witness initially by the Post Office, and then later by the Postmasters. Jason first spotted errors in the Horizon system in 2003, but had his findings dismissed by the Post Office. 

The EWI has developed Core Competencies for Expert Witnesses, which form the basis for all of our training courses. It is vital for Expert Witnesses to develop and maintain these core competencies to ensure that they meet their duties to the court and the Justice System. We urge all Expert Witnesses to undertake training to develop these core competencies and all instructing parties to ensure that the Expert Witnesses that they instruct are able to demonstrate they have these core competencies.

We can only speculate how different the Post Office Horizon case might have been if all the Expert Witnesses involved had had these core competencies.

 

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.