27 September 2022 Priya Vaidya 1383 Case Updates DPP v MR [2022] IECA 192 byPriya Vaidya The case: the respondent was a person with a long history of mental health issues. He had pleaded guilty to a number of offences: arson, assault causing harm, theft, assault, using or engaging in threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour and being intoxicated in a public place. The Director of Public Prosecutions sought a review of the sentences on the grounds that some of these were unduly lenient. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychiatrySentencing06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Is baldness a disease? Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch) Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost Medical Reports Switch article Dr Y, Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service Previous Article Bitar v Bank of Beirut SAL [2022] EWHC 2163 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.