26 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 2278 Case Updates Dana UK Axle Ltd v Freudenberg FST GmbH [2021] EWHC 1413 (TCC), 2021 WL 02143477 byWiebke Morgan The case: This claim arose from the alleged premature failure of pinion seals manufactured by the Defendant and supplied to the Claimant. The Claimant applied on Day 7 of the trial to exclude FST's technical expert evidence unless various defects in the reports of FST's technical experts were remedied. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags IndependenceDisclosure of instructionsDisclosure of documents relied uponRetention of records of investigations carried outCooperation with the adverse party’s expertsGuidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil CCPR Part 35TCC GuideExperts meeting10. Report Writing07. Working with Instructing Parties11. Responding to questions12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Switch article Ihenacho v The London Borough of Croydon [2021] EWCA Crim 798, 2021 WL 02143805 Previous Article Director of Public Prosecutions v Kenna [2020] IECA 265 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.