09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 521 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) bySean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing13. Changing your opinion12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements14. Giving Oral Evidence15. Criticism and Complaints09. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation Related articles Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer Krzysztof Lukasik v Circuit Court, Praga in Warsaw (A Polish Judicial Authority) [2025] EWHC 282 (Admin) Undisplaced spiral right humeral fracture – accidental or non-accidental? A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.