09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 595 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) bySean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation Related articles Is baldness a disease? Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch) Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost Medical Reports Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.