09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 682 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) bySean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation Related articles Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings Does the face fit? Not a bridge too far – dental negligence Pacemaker PTSD? Advising as to the applicable law Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.