26 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 800 Case Updates C v DT [2021] SC GLA 37, 2021 WL 02169444 byWiebke Morgan The case: The protected person was 17 years of age and ordinarily resident with her mother The first respondent is the father of the protected person. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags BiasForced marriageSocio-cultural evidenceRecords10. Report Writing13. Changing your opinion09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Switch article Beattie Passive Norse Limited v Canham Consulting Limited [2021] EWHC 1414 (TCC), 2021 WL 02170994 Previous Article Ihenacho v The London Borough of Croydon [2021] EWCA Crim 798, 2021 WL 02143805 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.