A fundamentally dishonest claimant A fundamentally dishonest claimant

A fundamentally dishonest claimant

This case concerns a fundamentally dishonest claimant. The judge held that the experts in the case were reliant on self-reporting by the claimant, who...
Read more
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Read more

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

CASE UPDATES
EXPERT MATTERS

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Wiebke Morgan 1074
Case Updates

Barrow v Merrett [2021] EWHC 792 (QB)

byWiebke Morgan

The evidence of the Defendant’s accident reconstruction experts began in what the judge said was a most unsatisfactory manner.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print

Tags

Change of opinion13. Changing your opinion

Related articles

Switch article

Previous Article Bux v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 762 Previous Article Crosby v Wakefield MBC, Leeds County Court, unreported, 24 January 2020 Crosby v Wakefield MBC, Leeds County Court, unreported, 24 January 2020 Next Article
Comments are only visible to subscribers.