13 March Podcast Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts 16. Criticism and Complaints, 17. Maintaining your professional edge, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points for expert witnesses. As always, you can also listen to our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence.
11 March Case Updates An expert report that is almost worse than useless 16. Criticism and Complaints, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 12. Responding to questions, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The claimant was involved in a minor road traffic accident while she was the passenger in a car driven by her partner, who was the defendant’s insured. She claimed compensation for whiplash and psychological symptoms. The judge described the report of the physiotherapist expert witness who acted for the claimant as almost worse than useless and aspects of her evidence as literally unbelievable Clark v Skyfire Insurance Company Limited, Canterbury County Court, 12th November 2025
10 March Helpline Q&A When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints Fitness to practice, regulator, 16. Criticism and Complaints, Professional Body Most professionals who act as expert witnesses are potentially subject to fitness to practice or other types of regulatory or professional body investigations. This can be extremely stressful and challenging even when the complaint appears to be vexatious or lacking in substance. So, we thought it would be helpful to offer a brief reminder of what you should do in such circumstances to ensure you meet your duties as an expert witness.
3 March Case Updates If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, Valuation Tribunal for England, Rating list assessment, Upper Tribunal (Land Chamber) The expert acting for the appellant had appeared before the Valuation Tribunal for England as advocate and expert for the appellant, and he continued to represent the appellant in its appeal before the Upper Tribunal (Land Chamber) until counsel was instructed close to the date of the hearing. The Tribunal noted that experts in these circumstances must take particular care to acknowledge their position and explain how compliance with the duties of an expert has been achieved. Espresso Rooms UK Limited v Nicola Johnson [2026] UKUT 70 (LC)
25 February Case Updates Qing Li & Ors v Fan Demetris Yuan & Anor [2026] EWHC 272 (Comm) 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 14. Changing your opinion Shortly after the close of the trial, the Claimants sought permission to rely on a short further addendum report from their expert in PRC law, Mr X. The Judge refused the application on the grounds that it would not be fair or proportionate to admit further expert evidence from Mr X.
18 February News Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents AI, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, Civil Justice Council, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 12. Responding to questions, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) has published an Interim Report and Consultation on the Use of AI for preparing court documents. The focus of the consultation paper is whether court rules are required to regulate the use of AI by legal representatives. However, the consultation also examines whether the use of AI by experts should be subject to court rules, with specific proposals set out in Part 8 of the consultation document.
18 February Case Updates Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th January 2026 16. Criticism and Complaints, 11. Report Writing, 14. Changing your opinion, 15. Giving Oral Evidence, Boundary dispute, Surveyor The claimants, who own a property adjoining with the properties of the defendants, complained that the defendants engaged in various acts of trespass on, and damage to, their property. The claimants’ expert, who replaced a retiring expert, referenced and relied on a key, but erroneous, “fact” in his predecessor’s report without checking it.
16 February Podcast Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism 04. Marketing, 16. Criticism and Complaints, 17. Maintaining your professional edge, 06. Rules and Regulations, 08. Working with Instructing Parties In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case of Kolomoisky, and hear the thoughts and advice of the members of the EWI Editorial Committee. As always, you can also listen to our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence. You can listen to the Expert Matters Podcast on a number of podcast apps, including spotify and apple podcasts.
12 February Case Updates McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm) 01. Starting your Expert Witness Business, 16. Criticism and Complaints, CV, CV Writing, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 14. Changing your opinion, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements, 15. Giving Oral Evidence, Motorsport The claimant alleged that the second defendant, a Spanish racing driver, had repudiated a binding agreement under which he was contracted to drive for the claimants’ IndyCar team for the 2024, 2025 and 2026 racing seasons. The judge found some of the expert witnesses to be impressive and independent, while the expert evidence of others was unimpressive and disappointing.
9 February News Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2 forensic science regulator, Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, Sir Brian Leveson The Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, chaired by Sir Brian Leveson, has just published Part 2 of the Review with 135 recommendations, including some relating to expert evidence. The Review was commissioned by the government because of the backlogs that have developed in the criminal justice system.