29 May Case Updates Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court 16. Criticism and Complaints, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The case concerned around 40 studio recordings of performances which were given by the members of the Jimi Hendrix Experience. The expert witnesses in New York law were commended by the judge on their written and oral evidence. The judge was not persuaded by any of the criticisms of the claimants' expert made by the defendant. Noel Redding Estate Ltd & Anor v Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited [2026] EWHC 983 (Ch)
22 May Case Updates Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) 07. Receiving Instructions, 16. Criticism and Complaints, Accountancy, 11. Report Writing, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The claimant asserted misrepresentation and breach of a collateral contract by the defendant in respect of the supply of a vertical diamond cutting lathe for the claimant’s car wheel repair business. The judge found that the accountancy reports were not expert evidence but simply aids to understanding the details in a complex case.
22 May News Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings Unregulated Experts, Family Procedure Rule Committee, Family Procedure Rules, Children Proceedings, Financial Remedy Proceedings, 06. Rules and Regulations From March to June 2025, the Family Procedure Rule Committee held a consultation on new Family Procedure Rule 25.5A concerning the instruction of unregulated experts. The Committee has now indicated that changes to the FPR on unregulated experts in children proceedings will be included in the next statutory instrument, expected in July, alongside the corresponding practice direction changes.
19 May Podcast Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026 This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we preview the EWI Annual Conference which will be held virtually on 19 June 2026. We look at some of the themes from expert witness conferences in 2025, including talking to Holly King about 'How to reduce the re-traumatisation of claimants in medico-legal litigation claims', consider the programme for our 2026 conference, and introduce a new segment on the podcast called 'A case that changed me'. As always, you can also listen to our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence.
14 May Case Updates David Abbott & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2026] EWHC 941 (KB) 16. Criticism and Complaints, 11. Report Writing, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements The judgment dealt with two test cases and a number of generic issues arising from a series of claims brought by former members of the military for damages for noise induced hearing loss (‘NIHL’). The judge preferred the evidence of the defendant’s employment expert who had more relevant experience and knowledge and engaged more critically with the evidence.
1 May News Experts acting in conflict zones 07. Receiving Instructions, 09. Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits Recent events in the middle east have reminded us all how quickly dangerous situations can arise. Members may regularly act in conflict zones, or be offered work that requires them to travel to conflict zones to, for example, inspect property damage, etc. Before you accept instructions for international work in conflict zones, we recommend you stop and consider these points set out in this article.
17 April Podcast Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Marketing In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on getting the basics right, developing a marketing strategy, and key marketing channels. As always, you can also listen to our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence.
14 April Case Updates DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) Capacity, 09. Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert, 16. Criticism and Complaints, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 12. Responding to questions, Court of Protection This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by respondents 2-7 to replace the jointly instructed expert with a new expert or, at the very least, permission for them to instruct their own expert. The judge did not find grounds to end the Single Joint Expert’s instruction but was satisfied that permitting respondents 2-7 to obtain a further report was appropriate in this particular case.
1 April Case Updates Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149 TUI UK Ltd v Griffiths, ECHR, 06. Rules and Regulations The Secretary of State for the Home Office was appealing the decision of the First Tier Tribunal (‘FTT’) to allow the Respondent’s appeal on Article 2 and 3 ECHR grounds against his deportation to Afghanistan. The Home Office did not seek to challenge the Respondent’s experts by requiring either of the experts to attend for cross-examination.
25 March Case Updates Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Family Law, 16. Criticism and Complaints, 15. Giving Oral Evidence, Russian Law, Post-Nuptial Agreement The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert evidence on Russian law was misdirected and misspent, and of limited use. He emphasised that both experts acted at times as surrogate advocates on behalf of their instructing parties.