06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 896 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.