06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 986 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing Related articles JXX v Scott Archibald [2025] EWHC 69 (SCCO) Consent – post-Montgomery A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward as an expert witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness NMC Health PLC v Ernst & Young LLP [2024] EWHC 3021 (Comm) Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.