“What is the purpose of the joint statement?”

This judgment illustrates how expert reports which are properly prepared can assist a decision-maker without the need for oral evidence. It also shows how thoroughly the court will analyse expert evidence as to risk.

“A risky risk assessment”

“Four inexperienced experts on their learning curve”

“Referring to the Protocol gives the game away”

“Beware opining on the reliability of a complainant”

“Confirmation bias and confidence limits”

“Unnecessary detail”

“What if the parent cannot afford to pay for the recommended therapy?”

“Is a section 49 report an expert report?”