The case: The appellant was convicted of rape, sexual assault and making a threat to kill or cause serious harm to the complainant The appellant in the four of five interviews denied sexual intercourse but when the results of certain DNA tests showing the presence of his semen in or on the body of the complainant were put to him in the fifth, he said that intercourse had taken place by consent.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login