17 September 2024 Keith Rix 334 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery10. Report Writing14. Giving Oral Evidence15. Criticism and Complaints Switch article Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis Previous Article Good practice points in asylum and immigration psychiatric reports Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.