Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

The parties disagreed on the extent of the repairs required to the joists, and the manner in which the repairs should be effected, following the...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

We have previously considered the problem for experts of redacted medical records. This, and the actual disclosure of medical, and also safeguarding,...
Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Have your say in this important research and be in with a chance of winning £200 in vouchers of your choice.
Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch) Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

The case focussed on the validity of a will and codicil made by a wealthy lady, Mrs MacDougall, as well as a number of substantial gifts and...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings
Sean Mosby 2873

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

bySean Mosby

 

The Ministry of Justice has published a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings.

The call for evidence is to help the Ministry better understand how the current presumption concerning the admissibility of computer evidence is working in practice, and whether it is fit for purpose in the modern world. The limitations of this presumption have been highlighted starkly by the Post Office Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted based on evidence which is now known to have been false, due to faults in the Horizon accounting software system. This clearly demonstrated the fallibility of evidence produced by software. 

The Ministry wishes to increase its evidence base and understanding of the ways in which evidence produced by software is handled in criminal proceedings. This includes how this evidence is treated in other jurisdictions, and any challenges or issues with the current position in this country.

Current Common Law Presumption

Since 2000 there has been a common law (rebuttable) presumption that the computer was operating correctly at the material time. The presumption is a rebuttable one, meaning that if it can be shown that the software may not have been functioning correctly, the burden shifts to whoever is seeking to rely on the evidence to prove that it was. 

Proposed scope of any reform to the law

The Ministry is keen that any changes to the current common law presumption are carefully defined to only include that evidence which is generated by software, including Artificial Intelligence and algorithms. It believes that evidence which is merely captured or recorded by a device should be excluded.

Questions

The Ministry is seeking responses to a series of questions set out at the end of the call for evidence.

How to respond

You can respond to the call for evidence by email to computer.evidence@justice.gov.uk by 15 April 2025. The EWI will be submitting a response to the call for evidence. If you would like to provide input into the EWI's response, please contact us at policy@ewi.org.uk by 31 March 2025.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.