Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

We are pleased to welcome a new Corporate Partner
Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Successful Certification candidates receive their certificate from Lord Hodge.
Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Range of Opinion is the focus of the 5th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast. We catch up with Colin Holburn, Chair of the EWI Membership Committee,...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...
Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

2023 in Review: Don’t let complacency ruin your credibility
Simon Berney-Edwards 1549

2023 in Review: Don’t let complacency ruin your credibility

bySimon Berney-Edwards

EWI Chief Executive Officer, Simon Berney-Edwards, shares his thoughts on 2023, a year where Expert Witnesses have continued to come under increasing scrutiny.

 

As we come to the end of the year, I’m taking the opportunity to reflect on yet another interesting year for Expert Witnesses. Once again, there have been several high-profile cases which have reflected the best and worst in Expert Evidence. So here are my top ten takeaways from 2023.

 

1. Don’t get complacent

You may have many years of experience as an Expert Witness, but even the most experienced experts can get things wrong. Over the last year we have seen:

  • Numerous reports submitted for assessment which have contained the wrong declarations and/or statement of truth.
  • Examples of experts who were coerced by the legal team to do something that they felt wasn’t right, only to have this backfire in court.
  • Examples of experts facing criticism in the witness box because they hadn’t addressed all the issues, evidence, or range of opinion.

 

So…….

 

 

2. Make sure you are up to date

Whilst the EWI will always cover key rule and regulation changes in our monthly newsletter, we have now started emailing members directly when key practice changes happen, or important guidance is issued.

 

However, why not take some time now to review your templates to make sure are using the correct declarations and statements of truth.

 

We’ve also created a Report Checklist you can use to ensure every report is compliant and of good quality.

 

 

3. Ensure you make yourself aware of some of the recent changes

On that note, you are hopefully fully aware of the recent changes that came into force at the beginning of October.

 

 

If you are not aware and you do work in these courts – it is important you familiarise yourself with these changes now.

 

 

4. Preparation is key to avoiding criticism

At this year’s Sir Michael Davies Lecture, the Honourable Mr Justice Williams, High Court judge and chair of The Family Justice Council Subcommittee on Experts, shared his views on the criticism of Experts in the courts.

 

His top tips to avoid it included:

 

  • Remember the fundamentals of being an expert.
  • Remain within your area of expertise.
  • Comply with the relevant procedural codes.
  • Don’t take on too much.
  • Comply with timetables.
  • Communicate any difficulties.

 

If you would like to hear more of what he had to say, you can access the recording.

 

 

5. Remain within your area of expertise

The judgment of Mrs Justice Bacon in Sycurio Ltd v PCI-Pal PLC & Anor [2023] EWHC 2161 (Pat) contains an important reminder for experts. During the course of the trial, it transpired that one of the expert witnesses (whose qualifications in their own field were not in doubt) had written a report and gave evidence on matters that were clearly outside their field of expertise. The result was that the judge was unable to accept their evidence on any matter that fell outside their core area of expertise.I am looking forward to hearing Mrs Justice Bacon’s views on this case at our Conference next year!

 

 

6. Review your opinion when necessary

If another Expert (whose opinion you rely on) changes their opinion, make sure you consider the implications for your opinion. A good example of this can be found in Benjamin Scarcliffe v Brampton Valley Group Ltd [2023] EWHC 1565(KB) which provides important lessons to be learned for all Expert Witnesses.

 

 

7. Take a moment to review your CV

Back in April, I reviewed the case of Watts v Watts [2023] EWHC 679 (Ch). This contains several learning points for experts. But one of the key issues affecting the credibility of the expert was that they had written nothing within their CV to demonstrate that they possessed the specific expertise relevant to the case.

 

Remember your CV needs to reflect why you can act as an expert in the case at hand.

 

Need some help? Why not attend our CV writing for Expert Witnesses webinar on the 24th January.

 

 

8. Consider how you might deal with dishonesty

The case of Muyepa v MOD highlighted the issues faced by Experts when dealing with fundamental dishonesty. Back in January, David Stothard, Managing Director at MAPS Medical, examined that case which was ultimately dismissed as a result of the claimant’s dishonesty.

 

He concluded by inviting experts to spend some time considering the evidence presented by the medical experts in this case set out in the judgment (paragraphs 167 to 278 inclusive), whether they fall within your area of expertise or not and reflect on how you might have presented your evidence had you been involved in the case.

 

 

9. Maintain your independence in discussions of Experts

There has been continued discussion during the year of the importance of remaining completely independent during meetings between Experts and ensuring experts do not involve their legal teams in the drafting of the joint statement or act on behalf of the legal team during the discussion. This was further clarified by new guidance from the King’s Bench division that clearly states this.

 

 

10. Maintain your credibility

Hopefully this will be clear by this point in this article, but some of the most easily rectifiable mistakes will seriously affect your credibility. So, as it is the end of the year, why not take some time to reflect on your practice and think about what you can do to ensure you retain your credibility in 2024.

 

 

And with that I wish you every success for the New Year.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.